Gallery 2

TODAY being the 8th of January 2022.

This is happening more and more by the RSPCA, is this really the level of service you condone for your money.

The richest animal charity treat animals like this yet greedily beg for your donations, for what, to leave animals to suffer.

How many mistakes are people like the RSPCA allowed to make before they are classed as incompetent?

A small selection of public opinion/comments. Interesting is the comment from someone at RSPCA, stating when they are full they use puppy crates, to house cats, tucked into every nook and cranny. WOW, as that would be a prosecution case if anyone else did that!

RSPCA interviewed their eqiune expert Mark Kennedy, who they refer to as their, senior scientific manager for equines.

Mark said 'You will likely know a lot more about the history of an RSPCA rehomer than you would about a horse you buy or loan!'

However that would only be applicable if the RSPCA actually knew anything about the history of the horse or pony and also did not just make stories up to make themselves look superior.

Take a look at the photographs below.

One shows a screenshot from the RSPCA rehoming page, where they are claiming the pony has a 'poor history and lack of handling'. However photographs F.A.I.R. have managed to obtain of the very same pony, contradict their claims as they show her being shown in hand at a county show and also what looks like starting out to being ridden.

If this pony was difficult to handle at any time in the RSPCA's care, it could have been due to not only the people being incompetent, but also the fact that the pony had been traumatised and was suffering psycholigically from being snatched from everything she knew.

The RSPCA and other charities. would never admit to either.

Is animals being taken away in the way the RSPCA get the police to do under section 18 of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 and other legislation such as the Dangerous Dogs Act 1991 really in the best interests of the animals and their welfare?. Or causing more problems, traumatising animals and turning them into problem animals?.

We have many more examples of animals having obviously suffered in some way in the care of the RSPCA it's agents and other charities, after being taken into possession by the police, which is an offence under the Animal Welfare Act 2006.

Jun 18, 2012.

RSPCA and other animal charities are not at all helpful when you need help but very quick to take your money, here is one lady and her experience. 18th June 2012. before you donate to these charities just phone to ask for help and see what you get.

This attitude from the RSPCA has been going on for many many years, where exactly is their charity, helping animals and PREVENTION of cruelty?.

This pony actually belongs to an RSPCA inspector, it did not look like this two years previously. It looked healthy and in good condition two years previously!.



This inspector is going round and advising people about looking after their aminal's whilst they have a pony at home in this condition. They also stand in court and criminalise others for less than this.



We know there could be a valid reason/explanation why this pony is now in this state, however there are valid reasons and explanations behind almost every animal the RSPCA prosecutes someone for but the RSPCA are never interested in those, infact they will twist those very facts against their accused, rules for them and rules for everyone else.

Seems the RSPCA have been making 'MISTAKES' for many many years, 14 years ago, this lady says, so that would be 2007. FAIR are aware of many 'mistakes' by the RSPCA, one includes, the wrong horse being put to sleep, which resulted in a horse, which was claimed to be suffering, being alive many months later, without any relief having been given to relieve that suffering! an offence under the Animal welfare Act 2006 section 4. When are the government, or someone else with authority, going to put a stop to this?

Sara-Lise Howe, who tweeted this, is a defence barrister, having worked for the defence in many RSPCA prosecutions.

Seems the RSPCA still do not like their staff telling the truth in court and the only thing learned from the court case against them in 1985 was to do the reprimands unofficially to prevent being taken to court again!.

With all the claims of bullying etc why are the general public never listened to when they make claims of being bullied/harassed  by the RSPCA? Even unite the union have made claims of bullying and arrogance within the RSPCA.

Bullying is the way the RSPCA seem to work, from the top to the bottom.

Below are reactions from RSPCA staff on twitter in 2020, when someone asked about this incident.

Laughing and mocking a former colleague, their disrespect was quickly jumped on by a member of the public.

Considering the RSPCA staff freely display this attitude  on a very public social media platform, about a former work colleague who it was claimed was driven to suicide by the RSPCA, we dread to think what they are capable of behind closed doors, so to speak.

Claude enjoying his old age.

This is a short video taken of Claude in the last year of his life.  This is during the period the RSPCA alleged we were causing him 'suffering'. 

The Crown Prosecution service dropped the charges due to lack of evidence.

Meeting at Wendover Heights Vets 17 May 2013

This is a secret recording made at the RSPCA vets leading up to the euthanasia of Claude the cat. 

You will hear the RSPCA vet admit that she doesn't know for sure if there is anything wrong with him, but they still killed him anyway. 

You will hear the RSPCA inspector say things like "I don't want to but I know I can force you" to sign the euthanasia consent and "the Law is on my side".

Worst of all you will hear the owner begging the RSPCA to wait a few hours for her daughter to say good-bye to the cat she had known all her life and loved dearly.  You will hear the vet ask what time that would be before the inspector butts in to refuse this.  The vet was not in charge here, it was the inspector deciding when Claude died. This is why the RSPCA say in their apology that their "conduct fell below the level of compassion the public should expect from the RSPCA".

Today programme 11 August 2014.

Here we have an extract from Radio 4's Today programme.  Note the lies and mis-information given by the RSPCA's press spokesperson, David Bowles.

Compare and contrast his words to what actually happened on the secret Wendover Heights recording.

Meeting with the RSPCA 2 October 2014 Pt 1.

This video was made at a meeting at the offices of MHP Communications in London on 2 October 2014. In this video you will see the RSPCA's lawyer, Raymond Goodfellow, admit that they were wrong to start legal proceedings against the owners of Claude the Cat. From left to right the attendees are David Bowles, RSPCA Press Officer, Mike Tomlinson,Chair of the RSPCA Council, Ray Goodfellow and Stephen Wooler CB, RSPCA Independent Reviewer. They have just finished listening to the recording at Wendover Heights.

It took the RSPCA a further month to make this apology public. After the meeting, they asked Mr Wooler to write a separate review of Claude's case, but have refused to make that public.  They have refused to let me keep a copy. I have refused to see it until they agree to make it public. 

Meeting with the RSPCA 2 October 2014 pt 2

This is the second extract from the meeting with the RSPCA.

This opens with RSPCA Press Spokesman David Bowles, trying to get our lawyer to agree that the judge in our case was not critical of the RSPCA.  Sadly, it seems to have escaped Mr Bowles' attention that the case was dropped by the CPS before ever coming to trial, so there never was a judge in our case.  If only he'd done a little bit of homework before coming to the meeting.  Similar to what happened in August when he went on Radio 4 and said that the RSPCA did allow my children to say good-bye to Claude.

What happens next is that Stephen Wooler CB (RSPCA's Independent Reviewer) asks Ray Goodfellow (RSPCA Head of Legal) to step out of the meeting.  On their return, we finally start to get somewhere.....

RSPCA 'Behaved unlawfully' Over Cat

"We are sorry. The RSPCA got it horribly wrong"

Watch Richard Byrne go head-to-head with the RSPCA (England & Wales)'s Chris Wainwright after his cat Claude was unlawfully killed

Has the RSPCA changed or learned anything from this case?.

F.A.I.R. and its members say there is no change in their attitude today, nothing was taken and learned from this incident all those years ago.

Do people remember this from July 2018?. 



A yard which both the RSPCA and ROR (retraining of racehorses) had heavy involvement with, which one witness clearly states in this video. This witness went on to say that the RSPCA cannot investigate this incident, yet they did just that and instead of being in the dock along with others, the charities got away with it all.

When are these charities going to be brought before the courts for all their wrongdoings and atrocities?.

Is this really the standard we should expect from 'experts'? not even knowing basic dog breeds!

Yet the RSPCA constantly claim to be experts.

Experts in what we ask?

The RSPCA claim to have expert knowledge, but cannot identify common dog breeds.

Please see the photograph opposite, taken from the RSPCA's Trustees and Accounts Report 2018 about what they claim to be.

Actions speak louder than words!

Evidence says the RSPCA are far from experts.

 After reading the article do you think the CPS would have proceeded with this case? or decided not enough evidence? considering the judges comment that he could not be sure that the sheep was alive.



F.A.I.R. feels this may be further evidence that the RSPCA do not decide to prosecute using the code for crown prosecutors, as they claim.

Sam Wasson on 29 July 2020 said:

'Look at this poor boy, and the rspca won't do anything about it.. They went yesterday to look at him, they said he has a bowl, and a kennel, it's OK.. I have never seen a springer with locks, they must be hurting him.. Shame on you rspca, your rubbish.. Just hope he gets taken off them now there are lots of people involved'.

Another animal let down by the uk government, when are the government going to sort out the shambles of animal welfare enforcement, they make the laws then fail to enforce them. If the laws are important enough to make why are they not important enough to be properly enforced by the state.

Why do the RSPCA choose to go out to some calls and not others?.

Why do RSPCA choose to prosecute some people and not others?.

Why do RSPCA choose to never HELP anyone?.

What charitable acts do the RSPCA do?

Is this haphazard way an acceptable way of dealing with animal welfare and prosecutions?

When are the government going to be brave enough to do something about the RSPCA instead of just keep making claims and threats?.

The RSPCA are not going to change their ways or attitude as they believe they themselves do no wrong.

What a pathetic excuse from the RSPCA, yet they brag about having specialist teams who are fully trained for floods and disaster, a little bit of adverse weather and they cannot do their job. What would they say if people could not get to their animals because of the weather, we highly doubt they would accept that excuse from anyone else.






RSPCA release statement after dead horse found abandoned in Bransholme

The horse was discovered by a shocked mum on her way to work on Tuesday morning

ByAlex Grove  21 MAR 2018



The RSPCA has said it has launched an investigation after a horse was found dead in Bransholme.

The animal was discovered lifeless and laying on its side near Bude Park Allotments on Tuesday morning by Toni-Lou Nixon who was on her way to work.



The 36-year-old mum noticed the black horse and immediately went to check on it, hoping it was just asleep.

However, she soon realised the animal was dead and promptly called the police.



The RSPCA were also alerted to the death and the animal welfare organisation said it did receive calls regarding concerns about a group of tethered horses in Hull over the weekend.

However, due to snowy weather caused by the second ‘Beast from the East,’ officers could not get to Hull to inspect the animals.



A spokeswoman said: “We were unable to attend as soon as we would ordinarily have because the bad weather left us with officers travelling in very difficult conditions struggling to cope with a surge of emergency calls.



“We are looking into a report that a horse has died and would like to hear from anyone with information which could help us.



“The RSPCA does not agree with the tethering of horses because it can lead to welfare issues such as horses getting entangled, however it is not illegal.



“We and other horse charities are currently in the grip of an equine crisis and have more than 800 horses in our care.



“Our officers investigate dozens of calls about horses at risk every day across England and Wales.”

More RSPCA killings and claims of RSPCA inspectors bullying and being demanding of people.

Not quite sure what year this was, if anyone knows please let us know.

Are there any of these animal charities run properly.

Do charities have any scruples?.

RSPCA uses donations to investigate how much is in your WILL in latest charity shame

THE RSPCA uses charity donations to fund investigators to find out how much donors might leave in their wills, it has been revealed.

By HELEN BARNETT

PUBLISHED: 00:00, Wed, Sep 2, 2015 | UPDATED: 11:52, Wed, Sep 2, 2015.

Generous supporters of Britain's largest animal charity are unaware their funds are being used for "ruthless exploitation" to assess them and give them a wealth rating.

The RSPCA said 'legacy prediction' as it is called, is commonplace among charities, raising questions about the number of unsuspecting donors who have fallen prey to what Esther Rantzen described as "unscrupulous bullying".

The sickening practice was uncovered during an investigation into how charities traded the personal data of Samuel Rae, an 87-year-old former army colonel who suffered from dementia

He was duped out of £35,000 from conmen who bought his details from charities who sold his personal data 200 times.

The RSPCA, one of the charities which sent on his information, also sent his personal data to a firm specialising in legacy prediction.

Their job was to work out how much he was worth and estimate how much he would leave the charity in his will.

It was all done without his consent.

The catalogue of sickening practices all started because Mr Rae, of Cornwall, forgot to tick the box to stop his details being passed on.

Charity stalwart Esther Rantzen, who founded ChildLine, said generous donors were being seen as "walking wallets" who are victims are "unscrupulous bullying".

She said: "This 87-year-old gentleman, who gave a lifetime of service to his country and now suffers from dementia, was subjected to a frightening barrage of intimidation and deceit."

Tory MP Nigel Evans, former Commons public administration committee member, who oversees charities, said: "Because people have given once, they become a commodity to charities which they have seen fit to trade and use as they please."

The dirty practises were discovered when Mr Rae's son Chris made a 'subject access request'.

Information given to him revealed Mr Rae, along with other supporters, was scored relating to the likelihood of leaving money in his will. He was scored on a scale of one to 20, with one being the highest probability of giving. Mr Rae was listed as 13.

The RSPCA later admitted it continued to beg for donations from Mr Rae, despite him saying he didn't want to be contacted. The charity said this was "genuine error".

lf the money the RSPCA receives comes from donations left in wills.

The RSPCA has now launched a review of how it uses supporters' data and protection statements, since the investigation by the Daily Mail.

The charity said it had not broken the law and that legacy prediction was common practice among charities to "understand the make-up of our supporter base".

A spokesman said: "It simply provides a score and does not tell us whether anyone has actually left a legacy to the charity."

How many 'MISTAKES' can one organisation be allowed before something is done about them?. 

RSPCA inspectors do kill healthy animals, as can clearly be seen to be verified in this extract from their job application form opposite.

It seems you really do have to be a special kind of heartless to work for the RSPCA.

Why are workers/organisations who are unaccountable, allowed access to peoples confidential information held by such people as councils, police etc?.

Why is this charity treated differently to others?